Decentralization platform development path analysis

Decentralization games have always been a hot topic in the crypto market. Recently, the Magic platform on Arbitrum has become extremely popular, sparking discussions about the development path of decentralized gaming platforms. This article will analyze the development history of traditional gaming platforms and explore possible development paths for blockchain gaming platforms.

Development of Traditional Gaming Platforms

There are mainly three types of traditional game industry platforms: studio model, development engine model, and distribution platform model.

Studio Mode

The studio model started from game studios and gradually developed into a large company with multiple game IPs. Representative companies include Blizzard, which evolved from the initial "Warcraft" to owning several well-known IPs such as "World of Warcraft," "StarCraft," and "Diablo."

Development Engine Mode

The representative of the engine mode is Roblox, which provides a community-based virtual world gaming platform where users can design and create their own games and share them on the platform. Roblox has a large user base, especially popular among young users.

distribution platform model

The distribution platform model is typified by Steam, which started from its own games and developed into a large game distribution platform. Steam provides players with channels for purchasing and downloading games, and also offers developers a platform for promotion and distribution.

Development Path of Blockchain Gaming Platforms

Game Studio Mode and Public Chain Ecosystem

Blockchain game studios often start by creating hit games and then launch their own public chains. For example, Dapper Labs launched the Flow public chain and Axie Infinity launched Ronin. This model requires the first product to ignite the market, but it also faces risks such as the security of the public chain infrastructure.

Development Engine Mode

Decentralization development engines like Fragnova and Cocos-CBX provide a higher degree of freedom in the game development environment. However, they still face challenges in technology and ecosystem scale, and there is still a gap compared to mainstream engines like Unity.

distribution platform model

The distribution platform model is currently the choice of many decentralized gaming platforms. TreasureDAO started from the Loot ecosystem and has developed into the largest decentralized gaming platform on Arbitrum. Gala Games focuses on using tokens to incentivize the community and governance.

The key to this model lies in listing a sufficient quantity and quality of games. Currently, the number and quality of games on decentralized platforms still have a significant gap compared to mainstream platforms, but they are growing rapidly.

Development Space

Compared to traditional game companies, decentralized platforms still have significant room for growth. The following issues need to be addressed in the future:

• How to better utilize blockchain technology to protect user rights
• How to attract more players and developers to join, improve game quality and quantity
• How to compete with traditional platforms in the hot game sector

Decentralization platform is expected to disrupt centralized platforms in production relations, returning more rights to users and developers. However, continuous improvements are still needed in terms of user experience and security.

Conclusion

Decentralization gaming platforms face dual challenges of technology and market in future development. Continuous innovation is needed to create blockbuster games, attract users and developers, in order to stand out in fierce market competition.