Evolution of AI Training Paradigms: From Centralized Control to Decentralized Collaboration in Technology Revolution

In the full value chain of AI, model training is the most resource-intensive and technically demanding stage, directly determining the capability ceiling and practical application effects of the model. Compared to the lightweight calls in the inference phase, the training process requires continuous large-scale computing power investment, complex data processing workflows, and high-intensity optimization algorithm support, representing the true "heavy industry" of AI system construction. From the architectural paradigm perspective, training methods can be divided into four categories: centralized training, distributed training, federated learning, and the decentralized training that this article focuses on.

Centralized training is the most common traditional method, where a single institution completes the entire training process within a local high-performance cluster. All components, from hardware, underlying software, cluster scheduling systems, to training frameworks, are coordinated to operate by a unified control system. This deeply collaborative architecture optimizes the efficiency of memory sharing, gradient synchronization, and fault tolerance mechanisms, making it very suitable for training large-scale models like GPT and Gemini, with advantages of high efficiency and controllable resources. However, it also faces issues such as data monopolization, resource barriers, energy consumption, and single point risks.

Distributed training is the mainstream method for training large models, where the core idea is to decompose the model training tasks and distribute them to multiple machines for collaborative execution, in order to overcome the computing and storage bottlenecks of a single machine. Although it physically possesses "distributed" characteristics, it is still controlled, scheduled, and synchronized by a centralized institution, often running in a high-speed local area network environment. Through NVLink high-speed interconnect bus technology, the master node coordinates each sub-task uniformly. Mainstream methods include:

• Data parallelism: each node trains on different data with shared parameters, requiring matching model weights.
• Model Parallelism: Deploy different parts of the model on different nodes to achieve strong scalability.
• Pipeline Parallelism: Staged Serial Execution, Improving Throughput
• Tensor Parallelism: Fine-grained segmentation of matrix computations to enhance parallel granularity

Distributed training is a combination of "centralized control + distributed execution", analogous to the same boss remotely directing multiple "office" employees to collaborate on tasks. Currently, almost all mainstream large models ( GPT-4, Gemini, LLaMA, etc. ) are trained using this method.

Decentralization training represents a future path with greater openness and censorship resistance. Its core feature lies in: multiple mutually distrustful nodes (, which may be home computers, cloud GPUs, or edge devices ), collaborating to complete training tasks without a central coordinator, usually driven by protocols for task distribution and cooperation, and leveraging cryptographic incentive mechanisms to ensure the honesty of contributions. The main challenges faced by this model include:

• Device heterogeneity and partitioning difficulties: High coordination difficulty of heterogeneous devices, low efficiency in task partitioning.
• Communication efficiency bottleneck: Network communication is unstable, and gradient synchronization bottleneck is obvious.
• Lack of Trusted Execution: Lack of a trusted execution environment makes it difficult to verify whether nodes are truly participating in the computation.
• Lack of unified coordination: no central scheduler, complex task distribution and exception rollback mechanisms

Decentralization training can be understood as: a group of global volunteers contributing computing power to collaboratively train models. However, "truly feasible large-scale decentralization training" remains a systemic engineering challenge, involving multiple levels such as system architecture, communication protocols, cryptographic security, economic mechanisms, and model validation. Whether it can achieve "collaborative effectiveness + incentive honesty + correct results" is still in the early prototype exploration stage.

Federated learning, as a transitional form between distributed and Decentralization, emphasizes local data retention and centralized aggregation of model parameters, making it suitable for privacy-compliant scenarios such as healthcare and finance (. Federated learning possesses the engineering structure of distributed training and local collaborative capabilities, while also benefiting from the data dispersion advantages of Decentralization training. However, it still relies on trusted coordinating parties and does not possess fully open and censorship-resistant characteristics. It can be seen as a "controlled Decentralization" solution in privacy-compliant scenarios, with relatively mild training tasks, trust structures, and communication mechanisms, making it more suitable as a transitional deployment architecture in the industry.

) AI Training Paradigm Comparison Chart ### Technical Architecture × Trust Incentives × Application Features (

![AI Training Paradigm Evolution: From Centralized Control to Decentralization Collaboration Technological Revolution])https://img-cdn.gateio.im/webp-social/moments-f0af7b28242215cca3784f0547830879.webp(

) Decentralization training's boundaries, opportunities, and realistic paths

From the perspective of training paradigms, Decentralization training is not suitable for all types of tasks. In some scenarios, due to complex task structures, extremely high resource demands, or significant collaboration difficulties, it is inherently unsuitable for efficient completion among heterogeneous, trustless nodes. For example, large model training often relies on high memory, low latency, and high bandwidth, making it difficult to effectively partition and synchronize in an open network; tasks with strong data privacy and sovereignty restrictions ###, such as medical, financial, and sensitive data (, are constrained by legal compliance and ethical restrictions, making open sharing impossible; and tasks lacking collaborative incentive foundations ), such as enterprise closed-source models or internal prototype training (, lack external participation motivation. These boundaries collectively constitute the current real limitations of Decentralization training.

But this does not mean that decentralized training is a false proposition. In fact, in lightweight, easily parallelizable, and incentivized task types, decentralized training shows clear application prospects. This includes but is not limited to: LoRA fine-tuning, behavior alignment-based post-training tasks ) such as RLHF, DPO (, data crowdsourcing training and labeling tasks, resource-controlled small foundational model training, and collaborative training scenarios involving edge devices. These tasks generally possess high parallelism, low coupling, and tolerance for heterogeneous computing power, making them very suitable for collaborative training through P2P networks, Swarm protocols, distributed optimizers, and other means.

)# Decentralization Training Task Adaptability Overview

![Evolution of AI Training Paradigms: From Centralized Control to Decentralization Collaboration Technical Revolution]###https://img-cdn.gateio.im/webp-social/moments-3a83d085e7a7abfe72221958419cd6d8.webp(

) Decentralization training classic project analysis

Currently, in the forefront of decentralized training and federated learning, representative blockchain projects mainly include Prime Intellect, Pluralis.ai, Gensyn, Nous Research, and Flock.io. From the perspective of technological innovation and engineering implementation difficulty, Prime Intellect, Nous Research, and Pluralis.ai have proposed many original explorations in system architecture and algorithm design, representing the cutting-edge direction of current theoretical research; while Gensyn and Flock.io have relatively clear implementation paths and have already shown preliminary engineering progress. This article will successively analyze the core technologies and engineering architectures behind these five projects, and further discuss their differences and complementary relationships in the decentralized AI training system.

Prime Intellect: A pioneer in training trajectory verifiable reinforcement learning collaborative networks

Prime Intellect is committed to building a trustless AI training network that allows anyone to participate in training and receive reliable rewards for their computational contributions. Prime Intellect aims to create a verifiable, open, and fully incentivized AI Decentralization training system through the three major modules: PRIME-RL, TOPLOC, and SHARDCAST.

1. Prime Intellect Protocol Stack Structure and Key Module Value

![AI Training Paradigm Evolution: From Centralized Control to Decentralization Collaborative Technological Revolution]###https://img-cdn.gateio.im/webp-social/moments-45f26de57a53ac937af683e629dbb804.webp(

2. Detailed Explanation of the Key Mechanisms of Prime Intellect Training

PRIME-RL: Decoupled Asynchronous Reinforcement Learning Task Architecture

PRIME-RL is a task modeling and execution framework customized by Prime Intellect for decentralized training scenarios, designed specifically for heterogeneous networks and asynchronous participation. It adopts reinforcement learning as the preferred adaptation object, structurally decoupling the training, inference, and weight upload processes, allowing each training node to independently complete task cycles locally and collaborate through standardized interfaces with verification and aggregation mechanisms. Compared to traditional supervised learning processes, PRIME-RL is more suitable for achieving flexible training in environments without centralized scheduling, reducing system complexity and laying the foundation for supporting multi-task parallelism and policy evolution.

TOPLOC: Lightweight Training Behavior Verification Mechanism

TOPLOC) Trusted Observation & Policy-Locality Check( is a core mechanism for training verifiability proposed by Prime Intellect, used to determine whether a node has truly completed effective policy learning based on observational data. Unlike heavy solutions such as ZKML, TOPLOC does not rely on full model recomputation; instead, it completes lightweight structural verification by analyzing the local consistency trajectory between "observation sequence ↔ policy update." It transforms the behavioral trajectory during the training process into a verifiable object for the first time, which is a key innovation for achieving trustless training reward allocation. This provides a feasible path for constructing an auditable and incentive-compatible Decentralization collaborative training network.

SHARDCAST: Asynchronous Weight Aggregation and Propagation Protocol

SHARDCAST is a weight propagation and aggregation protocol designed by Prime Intellect, optimized for asynchronous, bandwidth-constrained, and dynamically changing node state in real network environments. It combines a gossip propagation mechanism with a local synchronization strategy, allowing multiple nodes to continuously submit partial updates in an unsynchronized state, achieving progressive convergence of weights and multi-version evolution. Compared to centralized or synchronized AllReduce methods, SHARDCAST significantly enhances the scalability and fault tolerance of Decentralization training, serving as the core foundation for building stable weight consensus and continuous training iterations.

OpenDiLoCo: Sparse Asynchronous Communication Framework

OpenDiLoCo is a communication optimization framework independently implemented and open-sourced by the Prime Intellect team, based on the DiLoCo concept proposed by DeepMind. It is specifically designed to address challenges commonly encountered in decentralized training, such as bandwidth constraints, heterogeneous devices, and unstable nodes. Its architecture is based on data parallelism, constructing sparse topological structures like Ring, Expander, and Small-World to avoid the high communication overhead of global synchronization, relying only on local neighbor nodes to complete collaborative model training. By combining asynchronous updates and fault tolerance mechanisms, OpenDiLoCo allows consumer-grade GPUs and edge devices to participate stably in training tasks, significantly enhancing the accessibility of global collaborative training, and is one of the key communication infrastructures for building decentralized training networks.

PCCL: Collaborative Communication Library

PCCL)Prime Collective Communication Library( is a lightweight communication library tailored by Prime Intellect for a decentralized AI training environment, aimed at addressing the adaptation bottlenecks of traditional communication libraries ) such as NCCL and Gloo( in heterogeneous devices and low bandwidth networks. PCCL supports sparse topology, gradient compression, low precision synchronization, and checkpoint recovery, and can run on consumer-grade GPUs and unstable nodes. It is a fundamental component supporting the asynchronous communication capability of the OpenDiLoCo protocol. It significantly enhances the bandwidth tolerance and device compatibility of training networks, paving the way for building a truly open, trustless collaborative training network by overcoming the "last mile" of communication infrastructure.

Three, Prime Intellect Incentive Network and Role Division

Prime Intellect has built a permissionless, verifiable training network with economic incentives, allowing anyone to participate in tasks and earn rewards based on real contributions. The protocol operates based on three core roles:

• Task initiator: define the training environment, initial model, reward function, and validation criteria
• Training Node: Execute local training, submit weight updates and observation trajectories
• Validator nodes: Use the TOPLOC mechanism to verify the authenticity of training behavior and participate in reward calculation and strategy aggregation.

The core process of the protocol includes task publishing, node training, trajectory verification, weight aggregation )SHARDCAST(, and reward distribution, forming an incentive closed loop centered around "real training behavior."

![AI Training Paradigm Evolution: From Centralized Control to Decentralization Collaborative Technology Revolution])https://img-cdn.gateio.im/webp-social/moments-04fc0663a97f322d1554535ca56b4c1c.webp(

**